Clark v. Kreidt
This text of 199 So. 333 (Clark v. Kreidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The record and briefs have been examined and Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari should be *Page 3 granted and the judgment appealed from quashed, while Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice BROWN, and Mr. Justice THOMAS are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari should be denied.
When the members of the Supreme Court sit en banc for the consideration of appeals under Rule 34 of the Rules of this Court and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are premanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the writ of certiorari should be granted and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the writ will be denied and the decree or order below affirmed.
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decree appealed from be affirmed.
Affirmed.
TERRELL, C. J., WHITFIELD, P. J., BROWN, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, J. J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 So. 333, 145 Fla. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-kreidt-fla-1940.