Clark v. Kreidt

199 So. 333, 145 Fla. 1
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by34 cases

This text of 199 So. 333 (Clark v. Kreidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Kreidt, 199 So. 333, 145 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1940).

Opinions

ORDER
This is an appeal by certiorari from an interlocutory decree overruling a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint and from a decree granting a temporary restraining order. The appeal was prosecuted under Rule 34 of the Rules of this Court.

The record and briefs have been examined and Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari should be *Page 3 granted and the judgment appealed from quashed, while Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice BROWN, and Mr. Justice THOMAS are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari should be denied.

When the members of the Supreme Court sit en banc for the consideration of appeals under Rule 34 of the Rules of this Court and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are premanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the writ of certiorari should be granted and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the writ will be denied and the decree or order below affirmed.

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decree appealed from be affirmed.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., WHITFIELD, P. J., BROWN, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, J. J., concur.

ON CERTIORARI — ON RECONSIDERATION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tampa Port Authority v. M/V DUCHESS
65 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (M.D. Florida, 1997)
Sabina v. Dahlia Corp.
650 So. 2d 96 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Breeze v. State
634 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Miami Tele-Communications, Inc. v. City of Miami
743 F. Supp. 1573 (S.D. Florida, 1990)
Florida Crime Prevention Commission v. Cafiero
7 Fla. Supp. 2d 84 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1984)
City of Homestead v. Levy
444 So. 2d 1074 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1983
Coral Isle West Ass'n v. Cindy Realty, Inc.
430 F. Supp. 396 (S.D. Florida, 1977)
Union Camp Corp. v. Petition of Seminole Forest Water Management District
302 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
State v. Egan
287 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
In Re Grand Jury Investigation
287 So. 2d 43 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Jackson v. Princeton Farms Corp.
140 So. 2d 570 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
North Dade Water Co. v. Adken Land Co.
114 So. 2d 347 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Florida Industrial Commission v. Ebner
111 So. 2d 79 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Cole v. Babitz
101 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Albury v. Plumbers Local Union No. 519
100 So. 2d 647 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Stirling Music Co. v. Feilbach
100 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Smith v. Ryan
39 So. 2d 281 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 333, 145 Fla. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-kreidt-fla-1940.