Clark v. Inhabitants of Russell
110 Mass. 133
Opinion
Evidence of the amount necessarily expended by the defendants to put the roads in such order as the contract specified was admissible, because it tended to prove that the contract had not been substantially performed, and also the extent of the damage occasioned by the non-performance. Walker v. Orange, 16 Gray, 193. Moulton v. McOwen, 103 Mass. 587.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. Inhabitants of Russell, 110 Mass. 133 (Mass. 1872).
110 Mass. 133 (Clark v. Inhabitants of Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Iverson v. Petnov
50 Mass. App. Dec. 68 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1972)
Gutov v. Clark
157 N.W. 49 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1916)
Denham v. Bryant
28 N.E. 691 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)
Florence Machine Co. v. Daggett
135 Mass. 582 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)