Clark v. Hilliard

423 U.S. 1066, 96 S. Ct. 805
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 12, 1976·No. No. 75-273·Published·Cited by 78 cases

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. Hilliard, 423 U.S. 1066, 96 S. Ct. 805 (1976).

423 U.S. 1066 (Clark v. Hilliard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Tharp
101 A.3d 736 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
United States v. Johnson
131 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (N.D. Iowa, 2001)
State v. Friedel
714 N.E.2d 1231 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1999)
United States v. Carlyle
964 F. Supp. 8 (District of Columbia, 1997)
United States v. Buckhanan
905 F. Supp. 654 (D. Nebraska, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Munson
615 A.2d 343 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
United States v. Hayward
772 F. Supp. 399 (N.D. Illinois, 1991)
Foster v. Jeffers
813 S.W.2d 449 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1991)
United States v. James W. Fozo and Mieddie Thomas
904 F.2d 1166 (Seventh Circuit, 1990)
Samuel B. Cerro v. United States
872 F.2d 780 (Seventh Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Gambino, Rosario
864 F.2d 1064 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Alcocer v. Superior Court
206 Cal. App. 3d 951 (California Court of Appeal, 1988)
United States v. Bailey
689 F. Supp. 1478 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
Randle v. City and County of San Francisco
186 Cal. App. 3d 449 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)
In re Paradyne Corp.
803 F.2d 604 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Max Allen Ellison
798 F.2d 1102 (Seventh Circuit, 1986)