Clark v. County of Fairfax

624 F. App'x 79
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 3, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1705
StatusPublished

This text of 624 F. App'x 79 (Clark v. County of Fairfax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. County of Fairfax, 624 F. App'x 79 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric S. Clark appeals the district court’s order denying his- motion for leave to amend the complaint, following the district court’s dismissal of Clark’s first complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and this Court’s affirmance of that order. See Clark v. Cnty. of Fairfax, 554 Fed.Appx. 171 (4th Cir.2014) (No. 13-2101). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eric Clark v. County of Fairfax, Virginia
554 F. App'x 171 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 F. App'x 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-county-of-fairfax-ca4-2015.