Clark v. County of Fairfax

586 F. App'x 123
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 2014
DocketNo. 14-1767
StatusPublished

This text of 586 F. App'x 123 (Clark v. County of Fairfax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. County of Fairfax, 586 F. App'x 123 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric S. Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Clark v. Cnty. of Fairfax, No. 1:14-cv-00286-LMB-JFA, 2014 WL 3615874 (E.D.Va. July 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
586 F. App'x 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-county-of-fairfax-ca4-2014.