Clark v. American & Efird Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Clark v. American & Efird Mills

323 S.E.2d 920, 312 N.C. 616, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2214

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 8, 1985·No. No. 167A84·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The Industrial Commission is to determine on remand whether claimant has an occupational disease and whether claimant is disabled as a result thereof in light of the factors enumerated in this Court’s opinion in Rutledge v. Tultex Corporation, 308 N.C. 85, 301 S.E. 2d 359 (1983).

Affirmed.

Justice VAUGHN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The Industrial Commission is to determine on remand whether claimant has an occupational disease and whether claimant is disabled as a result thereof in light of the factors enumerated in this Court’s opinion in Rutledge v. Tultex Corporation, 308 N.C. 85, 301 S.E. 2d 359 (1983).

Affirmed.

Justice VAUGHN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Clark v. American & Efird Mills, 323 S.E.2d 920, 312 N.C. 616, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2214 (N.C. 1985).

Pincite

323 S.E.2d 920 (Clark v. American & Efird Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related