Clark v. American & Efird Mills
323 S.E.2d 920, 312 N.C. 616, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2214
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 8, 1985
DocketNo. 167A84
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 323 S.E.2d 920 (Clark v. American & Efird Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clark v. American & Efird Mills, 323 S.E.2d 920, 312 N.C. 616, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2214 (N.C. 1985).
Opinion
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The Industrial Commission is to determine on remand whether claimant has an occupational disease and whether claimant is disabled as a result thereof in light of the factors enumerated in this Court’s opinion in Rutledge v. Tultex Corporation, 308 N.C. 85, 301 S.E. 2d 359 (1983).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Norris v. Myrtle Desk Company Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 1996
Clark v. American & Efird Mills
346 S.E.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)
McHargue v. Burlington Industries
337 S.E.2d 584 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
323 S.E.2d 920, 312 N.C. 616, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 2214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-american-efird-mills-nc-1985.