Clark

Court of Claims

Clark

149 Ct. Cl. 836, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 99

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 Ct. Cl. 699 →

United States Court of Claims·Decided February 3, 1960·No. No. 464-58·Published

Opinion

Civilian pay. Upon consideration of plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment, together with the briefs and oral argument of counsel, and based on the decision by this court in Chisholm v. United States, decided this date, ante, p. 8, it was ordered that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be gi'anted and defendant’s like motion denied, and judgment entered to that effect with the amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Rule 38(c). Defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled June 8,1960.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civilian pay. Upon consideration of plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment, together with the briefs and oral argument of counsel, and based on the decision by this court in Chisholm v. United States, decided this date, ante, p. 8, it was ordered that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be gi'anted and defendant’s like motion denied, and judgment entered to that effect with the amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Rule 38(c). Defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled June 8,1960.

Clark, 149 Ct. Cl. 836, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 99 (cc 1960).

Pincite

149 Ct. Cl. 836 (Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.