Clark

Court of Claims

Clark

149 Ct. Cl. 836, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 99

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedFebruary 3, 1960

DocketNo. 464-58

StatusPublished

This text of 149 Ct. Cl. 836 (Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark, 149 Ct. Cl. 836, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 99 (cc 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Civilian pay. Upon consideration of plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment, together with the briefs and oral argument of counsel, and based on the decision by this court in Chisholm v. United States, decided this date, ante, p. 8, it was ordered that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be gi'anted and defendant’s like motion denied, and judgment entered to that effect with the amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Rule 38(c). Defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled June 8,1960.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civilian pay. Upon consideration of plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment, together with the briefs and oral argument of counsel, and based on the decision by this court in Chisholm v. United States, decided this date, ante, p. 8, it was ordered that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be gi'anted and defendant’s like motion denied, and judgment entered to that effect with the amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Rule 38(c). Defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled June 8,1960.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 Ct. Cl. 836, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-cc-1960.