Clark

156 Ct. Cl. 699, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 72, 1962 WL 1557
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedJanuary 19, 1962
DocketNo. 464-58
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 156 Ct. Cl. 699 (Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark, 156 Ct. Cl. 699, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 72, 1962 WL 1557 (cc 1962).

Opinion

Civilian pay; dismissal; Performance Eating Act of 1950; veteran preference eligible; appeal to Civil Service Commission on merits. — Plaintiff, a veteran preference eligible, sued to recover the back pay of her civilian Government position on the ground that her dismissal for unsatisfactory performance of duties was violative of section 14 of the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944 because she was not given a hearing on the merits of her case by the Civil Service Commission. On February 3, 1960, the court issued an order, 149 Ct. Cl. 836, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of its decision in Chisholm v. United States, 149 Ct. Cl. 8. On January 19,1962, the court, on the basis of a report of Trial Commissioner Saul Eichard Gamer, ordered that judgment be entered for plaintiff in the sum of $7,330.03, with $550.64 of that sum to be credited to plaintiff’s retirement fund, $159.25 of the sum to be credited as premiums on plaintiff’s life insurance, and the balance of $6,620.14 to be paid to plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peter H. Beer v. United States
111 Fed. Cl. 592 (Federal Claims, 2013)
Ernest Paroczay v. The United States
369 F.2d 720 (Court of Claims, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 Ct. Cl. 699, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 72, 1962 WL 1557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-cc-1962.