Clarence O. Gibson Versus Judge Cornelius E. Regan

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 25, 2024
Docket24-KH-427
StatusUnknown

This text of Clarence O. Gibson Versus Judge Cornelius E. Regan (Clarence O. Gibson Versus Judge Cornelius E. Regan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clarence O. Gibson Versus Judge Cornelius E. Regan, (La. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

CLARENCE O. GIBSON NO. 24-KH-427

VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT

JUDGE CORNELIUS E. REGAN COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF LOUISIANA

September 25, 2024

Linda Wiseman First Deputy Clerk

IN RE CLARENCE O. GIBSON

APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE R. CHRISTOPHER COX, III, DIVISION "B", NUMBER 07-6779

Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy, Fredericka Homberg Wicker, and Jude G. Gravois

WRIT DENIED

In this writ application, relator, Clarence Gibson, seeks review of the trial

court’s August 28, 2024 orders, denying his Motion Requesting Decision of

Motions Filed and his Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. For the following

reasons, we deny the writ application.

Relator was charged with aggravated rape of a known juvenile in violation

of La. R.S. 14:42. In 2009, after a jury trial, he was convicted of the lesser

included offense of sexual battery, in violation of La. R.S. 14:43.1, and sentenced

to 25 years of imprisonment at hard labor. Relator’s conviction and sentence were

reviewed and upheld by this Court and the Louisiana Supreme Court. State v.

Gibson, 09-486 (La. App. 5 Cir. 3/9/10), 38 So.3d 373, writ denied, 10-802 (La.

11/5/10), 50 So.3d 814.

24-KH-427 On August 13, 2024, relator filed a Motion Requesting Decision of Motions

Filed, with the trial court, requesting copies of the trial court’s rulings on several of

his motions. On August 28, 2024, the trial court denied relator’s request, stating,

“In all orders, the Court has listed the defendant, at his present place of

incarceration, as provided by the defendant in his filings, to be served with the

Court’s orders. No further relief is warranted.” In addition, on August 14, 2024,

relator filed a Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence raising a claim of double

jeopardy and arguing that his sentence should be served in Jefferson Parish. On

August 28, 2024, the trial court denied the motion, stating:

As a matter of law, the Court cannot grant the requested relief. First, there is no showing of a double jeopardy violation. Furthermore, this Court does not have the authority to transfer inmates within the Department of Public Safety and Corrections (“DPSC”). The law provides that an individual shall be committed to the DPSC and not to any particular institution within the jurisdiction of the department. The director of corrections, not the Court, shall assign each newly- committed inmate to an appropriate penal or correctional facility. La R.S. 15:824(A).

On September 17, 2024, relator filed this writ application, entitled “Appeal,”

stating he made a verbal claim of innocence during his sentencing, but was unable

to “immediately appeal” because the State filed a multiple offender bill of

information. However, the relief relator seeks is unclear, considering relator

previously filed an appeal and his conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct

review. See Gibson, supra.

Relator has submitted copies of the trial court’s August 28, 2024 rulings on

his Motion Requesting Decision of Motions Filed and Motion to Correct Illegal

Sentence with this Court. However, the writ application is silent as to whether, and

on what grounds, he is seeking review of those rulings.

Additionally, the writ application is deficient, because it does not include an

index of attachments, a statement of jurisdiction, a statement of the case, a list of

2 the issues presented, or a list of the assignments of error, as required by U.R.C.A.,

Rule 4-5(C). Relator has also failed to include copies of (1) each pleading on

which the ruling was founded; (2) a notice of intent requesting a return date; and

(3) an order from the trial court setting a return date for relator to file this writ

application. See U.R.C.A., Rules 4-2, 4-3, and 4-5(C).

Moreover, relator’s application includes a one-page diatribe containing

offensive language and the use of homophobic slurs, in violation of U.R.C.A, Rule

2-12.2(B), which provides:

The language used in the brief shall be courteous, free from vile, obscene, obnoxious, or offensive expressions, and free from insulting, abusive, discourteous, or irrelevant matter or criticism of any person, class of persons or association of persons, or any court, or judge or other officer thereof, or of any institution. Any violation of this Subsection shall subject the author, or authors, of the brief to punishment for contempt of court, and to having such brief returned.

This Court will not consider filings containing such language. We further

caution relator that the use of such language in pleadings may subject him to

punishment for contempt.

Considering relator’s writ application is deficient, contains inappropriate

language, and the relief sought is unclear, we deny this writ application.

Gretna, Louisiana, this 25th day of September, 2024.

FHW SMC JGG

3 SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL

CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT

SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. WISEMAN JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. FIRST DEPUTY CLERK SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT MELISSA C. LEDET JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400

(504) 376-1498 FAX www.fifthcircuit.org

NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS DAY 09/25/2024 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:

24-KH-427 E-NOTIFIED 24th Judicial District Court (Clerk) R. Christopher Cox, III (DISTRICT JUDGE) Thomas J. Butler (Respondent)

MAILED Clarence O. Gibson #366576 (Relator) Jefferson Parish Correctional Center P. O. Box 388 Gretna, LA 70054

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gibson
38 So. 3d 373 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clarence O. Gibson Versus Judge Cornelius E. Regan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clarence-o-gibson-versus-judge-cornelius-e-regan-lactapp-2024.