Clapp v. Thayer

112 Mass. 296
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 112 Mass. 296 (Clapp v. Thayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clapp v. Thayer, 112 Mass. 296 (Mass. 1873).

Opinion

By the Coubt.

The only exception taken is to the refusal to give the instructions prayed for, and we are of opinion that both, of them were rightly refused. Each of them requested the court to decide as matter of law what was purely a question of fact. It was for the jury to decide whether furnishing three hundred and thirty-one frames was a substantial compliance with a contract to furnish such frames “to the number of about four hundred; ” as well as whether frames weighing on the average twelve pounds the pair, substantially complied with a contract to furnish frames weighing ten pounds the pair. It is to be observed, as bearing upon the latter point, that the bill of exceptions states that there was evidence tending to show that there would be a variation (how much is not stated) from the patterns in ordinary castings. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Santa Paula Commercial Co. v. Parkhurst-Davis Mercantile Co.
120 P. 347 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1912)
Line v. Mason
67 Mo. App. 279 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)
Felton v. Aubrey
74 F. 350 (Sixth Circuit, 1896)
Brown v. Norton
2 N.Y.S. 869 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 Mass. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clapp-v-thayer-mass-1873.