Claim of Zivitz v. J & S Meat Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Zivitz v. J & S Meat Corp.

114 A.D.2d 709, 494 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53371

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 114 A.D.2d 709 (Claim of Zivitz v. J & S Meat Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Zivitz v. J & S Meat Corp., 114 A.D.2d 709, 494 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinions

Kane, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 7, 1984.

On August 7, 1970, claimant’s decedent, then 62 years of age, sustained a compensable myocardial infarction and was awarded benefits. In December 1971, decedent moved to Florida. In September 1976, a coronary bypass operation was performed and, as a result of this operation and other surgical [710]*710intervention, he was classified as permanently totally disabled and received benefits to the date of his death on May 14, 1982. Two years prior to death, decedent was found to be suffering from carcinoma of the colon. On May 6, 1982, he was hospitalized for supporting care only due to increasing pain from metastatic carcinoma of the colon to the liver and bone. His hospital record also included an additional diagnosis of unstable angina and a history of cranial surgery for subdural hematoma. Decedent died on May 14, 1982, with a death certificate indicating the immediate cause of death as metastatic colon cancer without reference to any other secondary or consequential cause of death.

The Workers’ Compensation Board has awarded widow’s benefits to claimant, finding from the entire medical record and the testimony of claimant’s experts that decedent’s demise was hastened by his causally related myocardial infarction and that death was causally related thereto. We reverse.

The record demonstrates that decedent died as a direct result of the cancer and there is no substantial evidence that decedent’s preexisting heart condition caused or contributed to the cancer. It is unsubstantial and pure speculation to hypothesize how long decedent would have survived with his impaired heart condition, or to what extent life could have been sustained had decedent requested life-supporting treatment. The facts of this case are strikingly similar to those found in Matter of Riehl v Town of Amherst (308 NY 212) and compel the same conclusion.

Decision reversed, without costs, and claim dismissed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kane, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 7, 1984.

On August 7, 1970, claimant’s decedent, then 62 years of age, sustained a compensable myocardial infarction and was awarded benefits. In December 1971, decedent moved to Florida. In September 1976, a coronary bypass operation was performed and, as a result of this operation and other surgical [710]*710intervention, he was classified as permanently totally disabled and received benefits to the date of his death on May 14, 1982. Two years prior to death, decedent was found to be suffering from carcinoma of the colon. On May 6, 1982, he was hospitalized for supporting care only due to increasing pain from metastatic carcinoma of the colon to the liver and bone. His hospital record also included an additional diagnosis of unstable angina and a history of cranial surgery for subdural hematoma. Decedent died on May 14, 1982, with a death certificate indicating the immediate cause of death as metastatic colon cancer without reference to any other secondary or consequential cause of death.

The Workers’ Compensation Board has awarded widow’s benefits to claimant, finding from the entire medical record and the testimony of claimant’s experts that decedent’s demise was hastened by his causally related myocardial infarction and that death was causally related thereto. We reverse.

The record demonstrates that decedent died as a direct result of the cancer and there is no substantial evidence that decedent’s preexisting heart condition caused or contributed to the cancer. It is unsubstantial and pure speculation to hypothesize how long decedent would have survived with his impaired heart condition, or to what extent life could have been sustained had decedent requested life-supporting treatment. The facts of this case are strikingly similar to those found in Matter of Riehl v Town of Amherst (308 NY 212) and compel the same conclusion.

Decision reversed, without costs, and claim dismissed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.2d 709, 494 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-zivitz-v-j-s-meat-corp-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack