Claim of Van Buren v. M. Vener Trucking Corp.

258 A.D. 1016, 16 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8653
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 17, 1940·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Claimant was injured while crossing the highway. He was the driver of one of the employer’s trucks. He saw another truck belonging to his employer parked at a gas filling station and stopped on the opposite side of the highway intending to inquire if the other driver needed assistance. Before crossing the highway claimant learned there was no need for his aid but he started to cross in response to an invitation to have a drink from the other driver. The nature of the drink was not disclosed. He did not abandon his employment. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Van Buren v. M. Vener Trucking Corp., 258 A.D. 1016, 16 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

258 A.D. 1016 (Claim of Van Buren v. M. Vener Trucking Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Franck v. Allen
270 A.D. 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
Jones v. Herbert Equities, Inc.
186 Misc. 163 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)