Claim of Van Buren v. M. Vener Trucking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Van Buren v. M. Vener Trucking Corp.

258 A.D. 1016, 16 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8653

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 258 A.D. 1016 (Claim of Van Buren v. M. Vener Trucking Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Van Buren v. M. Vener Trucking Corp., 258 A.D. 1016, 16 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Claimant was injured while crossing the highway. He was the driver of one of the employer’s trucks. He saw another truck belonging to his employer parked at a gas filling station and stopped on the opposite side of the highway intending to inquire if the other driver needed assistance. Before crossing the highway claimant learned there was no need for his aid but he started to cross in response to an invitation to have a drink from the other driver. The nature of the drink was not disclosed. He did not abandon his employment. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant was injured while crossing the highway. He was the driver of one of the employer’s trucks. He saw another truck belonging to his employer parked at a gas filling station and stopped on the opposite side of the highway intending to inquire if the other driver needed assistance. Before crossing the highway claimant learned there was no need for his aid but he started to cross in response to an invitation to have a drink from the other driver. The nature of the drink was not disclosed. He did not abandon his employment. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 1016, 16 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-van-buren-v-m-vener-trucking-corp-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack