Claim of Franck v. Allen
This text of 270 A.D. 960 (Claim of Franck v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by an employer and insurance carrier from an award in claimant’s [961]*961favor. Claimant was employed as a farm hand. On April 9, 1942, he was sweeping up the floor of the cow barn. He noticed an oblong shell-like object on the floor of the barn and he picked it up. It proved to be a dynamite cap. He attempted to remove the powder by knocking the shell but did not succeed. He then picked up a nail from a window sill, inserted it in the- cap with the result that the powder exploded and claimant suffered injuries. The board found that claimant’s injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment. The evidence sustains that finding. (Matter of Pedersen v. Nelson, 267 App. Div. 843; Matter of Derby v. International Salt Co., Inc., 233 App. Div. 15; Matter of Miles V. Gibbs & Ball, Inc., 250 N. Y. 590; Matter of Picharás v. Creamer, 267 App. Div. 928; Matter of Van Burén v. Vener Trucking Gorp., 258 App. Div. 1016.) Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D. 960, 61 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-franck-v-allen-nyappdiv-1946.