Claim of Scully v. Linwood Amusement Corp.
242 A.D. 885
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1934·Published
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. (Matter of Masten v. Rosoff, 226 App. Div. 835.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; McNamee, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim on the ground that it appeared from all the evidence and as a matter of law that the decedent died of heart disease and not as the result of any catastrophic event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Scully v. Linwood Amusement Corp., 242 A.D. 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 885 (Claim of Scully v. Linwood Amusement Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Mrs. M. B. v. Rosoff Sand & Gravel Corp.
226 A.D. 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)