Claim of Scully v. Linwood Amusement Corp.

242 A.D. 885

This text of 242 A.D. 885 (Claim of Scully v. Linwood Amusement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Scully v. Linwood Amusement Corp., 242 A.D. 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. (Matter of Masten v. Rosoff, 226 App. Div. 835.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; McNamee, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim on the ground that it appeared from all the evidence and as a matter of law that the decedent died of heart disease and not as the result of any catastrophic event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Mrs. M. B. v. Rosoff Sand & Gravel Corp.
226 A.D. 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-scully-v-linwood-amusement-corp-nyappdiv-1934.