Claim of Mrs. M. B. v. Rosoff Sand & Gravel Corp.
226 A.D. 835
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
— Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that the employment in which claimant was working did not continue during substantially the whole year and claimant’s average weekly wages were improperly calculated. (See Matter of Geroux v. McClintic-Marshall Co., 225 App. Div. 434; McDonald v. Burden Iron Co., 206 id. 571; Testo v. Burden Iron Co., 211 id. 219.) Van Bark, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Mrs. M. B. v. Rosoff Sand & Gravel Corp., 226 A.D. 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
226 A.D. 835 (Claim of Mrs. M. B. v. Rosoff Sand & Gravel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Scully v. Linwood Amusement Corp.
242 A.D. 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)