Claim of Pierce v. Young
225 A.D. 838
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board, on the authority of Matter of Madura v. City of New York (238 N. Y. 214); Matter of Hughes v. St. Patrick’s Cathedral (245 id. 201); Matter of Moore v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. (169 App. Div. 177; affd., 217 N. Y. 627). Present —Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer, and Hill, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Pierce v. Young, 225 A.D. 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
225 A.D. 838 (Claim of Pierce v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Deziley v. Semet-Solvay Co.
272 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)