Claim of Pierce v. Young

225 A.D. 838
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 A.D. 838 (Claim of Pierce v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Pierce v. Young, 225 A.D. 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board, on the authority of Matter of Madura v. City of New York (238 N. Y. 214); Matter of Hughes v. St. Patrick’s Cathedral (245 id. 201); Matter of Moore v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. (169 App. Div. 177; affd., 217 N. Y. 627). Present —Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer, and Hill, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Deziley v. Semet-Solvay Co.
272 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D. 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-pierce-v-young-nyappdiv-1929.