Home/New York Court of Appeals/Claim of Mansfield v. General Adjustment Bureau

Claim of Mansfield v. General Adjustment Bureau

232 N.E.2d 852, 20 N.Y.2d 881, 285 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1144
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 2, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 232 N.E.2d 852 (Claim of Mansfield v. General Adjustment Bureau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Mansfield v. General Adjustment Bureau, 232 N.E.2d 852, 20 N.Y.2d 881, 285 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1144 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinions

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board. (See, e.g., Matter of Gravest v. Tide Water Oil Sales Co., 275 N. T. 583, affg. 249 App. Div. 911; Matter of Lowery v. Riss & Co., 10 A D 2d 489, mot. for lv. to, opp. dem 8 N Y 2d 707.)

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burice, Bergan, Keating and Breitel. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim in the following memorandum in which Judge Scileppi concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rainear v. C. J. Rainear Co.
307 A.2d 72 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1973)
Claim of Mansfield v. General Adjustment Bureau
232 N.E.2d 852 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 N.E.2d 852, 20 N.Y.2d 881, 285 N.Y.S.2d 854, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-mansfield-v-general-adjustment-bureau-ny-1967.