Claim of Macin v. Harvard Auto Body Co.
231 A.D. 775
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that there is no evidence to sustain the finding that claimant within the year “ had come in direct contact with and had handled lead.” Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Macin v. Harvard Auto Body Co., 231 A.D. 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
231 A.D. 775 (Claim of Macin v. Harvard Auto Body Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Fay v. Gettinger
236 A.D. 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)