Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Fay v. Gettinger

Claim of Fay v. Gettinger

236 A.D. 767
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 15, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 767 (Claim of Fay v. Gettinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Fay v. Gettinger, 236 A.D. 767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that there is no evidence to sustain the finding that the claimant “ did not contract for employment with the said John Boyle as a principal employer, but contracted employment with him as an agent of the owner of the premises.” Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents and votes to affirm upon the authority of Matter of Westfelt v. Atlas Furniture Co. (231 App. Div. 775; affd., 256 N. Y. 578) and subdivision 4 of section 54 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Westfelt v. Atlas Furniture Company
177 N.E. 147 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
Claim of Macin v. Harvard Auto Body Co.
231 A.D. 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-fay-v-gettinger-nyappdiv-1932.