Claim of La Belle v. Britton Stone & Supply Corp.
247 A.D. 843
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The appellants contend that because the claimant was industrially blind at the time of the accident he was not entitled to an award for 100 per cent loss of vision. The prior accident causing said industrial blindness was not caused by an industrial accident, and, therefore, cannot be considered and does not bar claimant from a full schedule award. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of La Belle v. Britton Stone & Supply Corp., 247 A.D. 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
247 A.D. 843 (Claim of La Belle v. Britton Stone & Supply Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Ladutsky v. Tri-Motor Auto Service
6 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Burrock v. Tung Sol Lamp Works, Inc.
104 A.2d 875 (Essex County Court, 1954)
Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.
336 U.S. 198 (Supreme Court, 1949)
National Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of District of Columbia v. Britton, Deputy Com'r
147 F.2d 561 (D.C. Circuit, 1945)