Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co.
194 A.D. 945
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1920·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Award affirmed on the authority of Matter of Klein v. Stoller & Cook Co. (220 N. Y. 670); Matter of Fitzpatrick v. Blackall & Baldwin Co. (Id. 671), and Jenkins v. Hogan & Sons, Inc. (177 App. Div. 36), it having been found that the contract of employment was made in the year 1914. All concur, except John M. Kellogg, P. J., dissenting on the authority of Matter of Smith v. Heine Boiler Co. (224 N. Y. 9) and Matter of Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co. (171 App. Div. 66).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co., 194 A.D. 945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
194 A.D. 945 (Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibbs v. R. H. Macy & Co.
214 A.D. 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Minto v. Hitchings & Co.
204 A.D. 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
Claim of Harby v. Marwell Bros.
203 A.D. 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Claim of Crouse v. King
198 A.D. 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)