Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co.

194 A.D. 945

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1920

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 194 A.D. 945 (Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co., 194 A.D. 945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Award affirmed on the authority of Matter of Klein v. Stoller & Cook Co. (220 N. Y. 670); Matter of Fitzpatrick v. Blackall & Baldwin Co. (Id. 671), and Jenkins v. Hogan & Sons, Inc. (177 App. Div. 36), it having been found that the contract of employment was made in the year 1914. All concur, except John M. Kellogg, P. J., dissenting on the authority of Matter of Smith v. Heine Boiler Co. (224 N. Y. 9) and Matter of Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co. (171 App. Div. 66).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Award affirmed on the authority of Matter of Klein v. Stoller & Cook Co. (220 N. Y. 670); Matter of Fitzpatrick v. Blackall & Baldwin Co. (Id. 671), and Jenkins v. Hogan & Sons, Inc. (177 App. Div. 36), it having been found that the contract of employment was made in the year 1914. All concur, except John M. Kellogg, P. J., dissenting on the authority of Matter of Smith v. Heine Boiler Co. (224 N. Y. 9) and Matter of Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co. (171 App. Div. 66).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D. 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-hospers-v-j-hungerford-smith-co-nyappdiv-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack