Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Crouse v. King

Claim of Crouse v. King

198 A.D. 962
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1921
StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D. 962 (Claim of Crouse v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Crouse v. King, 198 A.D. 962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Award unanimously affirmed on the authority of Klein v. Stoller & Cook Co. (220 N. Y. 670); Fitzpatrick v. Blackall & Baldwin Co. (Id. 671); Matter of Post v. Burger & Gohlke (216 id. 544); Hospers v. Hungerford-Smith Co. (194 App. Div. 945; affd., 230 N. Y. 616); Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co. (181 App. Div. 915); Francavilla v. Mitchell, Inc. (231 N. Y. 510).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Klein v. . Stoller Cook Company
116 N.E. 1055 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Matter of Francavilla v. . C.T. Mitchell, Incorporated
132 N.E. 867 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Matter of Hospers v. . J. Hungerford Smith Company
130 N.E. 916 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Claim of Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co.
181 A.D. 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co.
194 A.D. 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 A.D. 962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-crouse-v-king-nyappdiv-1921.