Claim of Crouse v. King
198 A.D. 962
Opinion
Award unanimously affirmed on the authority of Klein v. Stoller & Cook Co. (220 N. Y. 670); Fitzpatrick v. Blackall & Baldwin Co. (Id. 671); Matter of Post v. Burger & Gohlke (216 id. 544); Hospers v. Hungerford-Smith Co. (194 App. Div. 945; affd., 230 N. Y. 616); Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co. (181 App. Div. 915); Francavilla v. Mitchell, Inc. (231 N. Y. 510).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Crouse v. King, 198 A.D. 962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).
198 A.D. 962 (Claim of Crouse v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Klein v. . Stoller Cook Company
116 N.E. 1055 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Matter of Francavilla v. . C.T. Mitchell, Incorporated
132 N.E. 867 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Matter of Hospers v. . J. Hungerford Smith Company
130 N.E. 916 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Claim of Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co.
181 A.D. 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co.
194 A.D. 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)