Claim of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.
251 A.D. 904, 297 N.Y.S. 960, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8215
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 1937·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
[905]*905Hill, P. J., Rhodes and Heffernan, JJ., concur on the grounds stated by Hill, P. J., in Matter of Bishop v. Comer & Pollock, Inc. [ante, p. 492], decided herewith; McNamee, J., dissents, with an opinion in which Crapser, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp., 251 A.D. 904, 297 N.Y.S. 960, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
251 A.D. 904 (Claim of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Roettinger v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
17 A.D.2d 76 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Bishop v. Cullen
253 A.D. 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)