Bishop v. Cullen
253 A.D. 865, 2 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8947
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 1938
StatusPublished
This text of 253 A.D. 865 (Bishop v. Cullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bishop v. Cullen, 253 A.D. 865, 2 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; MeNamee, J., dissents on the ground that this case presents purely a question of law, the proper disposition of which is fully indicated in the case of Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp. (251 App. Div. 904; affd., 276 N. Y. 313).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.
12 N.E.2d 311 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
Claim of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.
251 A.D. 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
253 A.D. 865, 2 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bishop-v-cullen-nyappdiv-1938.