Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Bishop v. Cullen

Bishop v. Cullen

253 A.D. 865, 2 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8947
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 20, 1938·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; MeNamee, J., dissents on the ground that this case presents purely a question of law, the proper disposition of which is fully indicated in the case of Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp. (251 App. Div. 904; affd., 276 N. Y. 313).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bishop v. Cullen, 253 A.D. 865, 2 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

253 A.D. 865 (Bishop v. Cullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.
12 N.E.2d 311 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
Claim of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.
251 A.D. 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)