Claim of Donlon v. Kips Bay Brewing & Malting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Donlon v. Kips Bay Brewing & Malting Co.

189 A.D. 415, 179 N.Y.S. 93, 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4685

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1919

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 189 A.D. 415 (Claim of Donlon v. Kips Bay Brewing & Malting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Donlon v. Kips Bay Brewing & Malting Co., 189 A.D. 415, 179 N.Y.S. 93, 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4685 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

The deceased was found dead at the bottom of an elevator shaft in the plant of his employer at about eleven-thirty o’clock in the forenoon. His regular work consisted of carrying and emptying buckets of beer, and was performed in a cellar room of the brewery in which he was employed. Adjoining this room was a lunch room in which the men employed in the cellar took their lunch between the hours of eleven and twelve. The room in which the deceased worked was window- less, cold, wet, and badly ventilated. For this reason the deceased and his fellow-employees, after their lunch, customarily went to the ground floor to walk about and get the fresh ah. In one of the rooms upon this floor there was a bar at which beer was served without charge. There was also a toilet which the men commonly used during the noon hour. Through the room adjoining there passed the shaft of the elevator, at the bottom of which, in the cellar below, the body of the deceased was found. The deceased ate his lunch in the lunch room between eleven and eleven-twenty-five in the forenoon, and went upstairs. If the deceased had been killed while eating lunch in this room his death would have occurred in the course of his employment. (Matter of McInerney v. B. & S. R. R. Corp., 225 N. Y. 130.) If, during the lunch hour, he fell down the elevator shaft while walking about on the ground floor to get the air, to go to the toilet, to warm up, to drink beer or to rest, as cellarmen were expected to do, his case could not logically be distinguished from the [417]*417case assumed. It must be presumed that he was present on the ground floor for some one or more of these legitimate purposes of bis employment, that while so present he accidentally fell down the elevator shaft, and that while in the course of his employment he was killed. (Matter of Driscoll v. Gillen & Sons Lighterage, Inc., 226 N. Y. 568, affg. 187 App. Div. 908.)

The award should be affirmed.

Award unanimously affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

The deceased was found dead at the bottom of an elevator shaft in the plant of his employer at about eleven-thirty o’clock in the forenoon. His regular work consisted of carrying and emptying buckets of beer, and was performed in a cellar room of the brewery in which he was employed. Adjoining this room was a lunch room in which the men employed in the cellar took their lunch between the hours of eleven and twelve. The room in which the deceased worked was window- less, cold, wet, and badly ventilated. For this reason the deceased and his fellow-employees, after their lunch, customarily went to the ground floor to walk about and get the fresh ah. In one of the rooms upon this floor there was a bar at which beer was served without charge. There was also a toilet which the men commonly used during the noon hour. Through the room adjoining there passed the shaft of the elevator, at the bottom of which, in the cellar below, the body of the deceased was found. The deceased ate his lunch in the lunch room between eleven and eleven-twenty-five in the forenoon, and went upstairs. If the deceased had been killed while eating lunch in this room his death would have occurred in the course of his employment. (Matter of McInerney v. B. & S. R. R. Corp., 225 N. Y. 130.) If, during the lunch hour, he fell down the elevator shaft while walking about on the ground floor to get the air, to go to the toilet, to warm up, to drink beer or to rest, as cellarmen were expected to do, his case could not logically be distinguished from the [417]*417case assumed. It must be presumed that he was present on the ground floor for some one or more of these legitimate purposes of bis employment, that while so present he accidentally fell down the elevator shaft, and that while in the course of his employment he was killed. (Matter of Driscoll v. Gillen & Sons Lighterage, Inc., 226 N. Y. 568, affg. 187 App. Div. 908.)

The award should be affirmed.

Award unanimously affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 A.D. 415, 179 N.Y.S. 93, 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-donlon-v-kips-bay-brewing-malting-co-nyappdiv-1919.

Opinion

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack