Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law, Made by Levine v. Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co.

258 A.D. 1023, 17 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8676
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 25, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 258 A.D. 1023 (Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law, Made by Levine v. Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law, Made by Levine v. Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co., 258 A.D. 1023, 17 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinions

Claimant entered into a written contract with appellant to act as a distributor of appellant’s goods. The claimant agreed to begin his efforts to sell the goods at [1024]*1024once, not to requisition them from appellant unless he had received actual orders, to assume responsibility for expense in connection with certain hinds of orders, to make a report each week of his activities, to give a bond and upon discontinuance of the contract to account for deposits received by him on goods undelivered. The contract provided that the company reserved no direction or control with respect to his activities other than the right to question the sufficiency of the results accomplished as measured by the requirements of the contract. Claimant was an independent contractor and not an employee.

Determination reversed and claim dismissed, with costs to appellant against the Industrial Commissioner.

Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Schenek, JJ., concur; Poster, J., dissents, in an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Ted Is Back Corp.
475 N.E.2d 113 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Department of Labor & Industry v. Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co.
82 A.2d 897 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
In re the Hearing of Electrolux Corp.
262 A.D. 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of Labor Law
262 A.D. 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
In re Hearing of Electrolux Corp.
261 A.D. 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
In re the Liability for Unemployment Insurance Contributions under Article 18 of the Labor Law of NuBone Co.
260 A.D. 973 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Alford
260 A.D. 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
In re the Claim for Benefits Under Article 18 of the Labor Law
259 A.D. 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 A.D. 1023, 17 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-for-benefits-under-article-18-of-the-labor-law-made-by-levine-v-nyappdiv-1940.