Civiello v. Rosemeyer

Third Circuit

Civiello v. Rosemeyer

28 F. App'x 127

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 22, 2002

DocketNo. 00-2108

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 F. App'x 127 (Civiello v. Rosemeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Civiello v. Rosemeyer, 28 F. App'x 127 (3d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge.

Appellant-Petitioner Douglas Civiello appeals the District Court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction to consider this appeal pursuant to the certificate of appealability granted by the District Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1).

Both the parties and this court are familiar with the record in this case, and we will not include a discussion of the record here. Based on our review of the District Court’s order and the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, we are convinced that the District Court reached the correct result when it denied Civiello’s petition. Thus, on the basis of the District Court’s order and the Magistrate Judge’s report, we affirm the District Court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge.

Appellant-Petitioner Douglas Civiello appeals the District Court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction to consider this appeal pursuant to the certificate of appealability granted by the District Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1).

Both the parties and this court are familiar with the record in this case, and we will not include a discussion of the record here. Based on our review of the District Court’s order and the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, we are convinced that the District Court reached the correct result when it denied Civiello’s petition. Thus, on the basis of the District Court’s order and the Magistrate Judge’s report, we affirm the District Court’s decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 F. App'x 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/civiello-v-rosemeyer-ca3-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack