City of Warren v. Clay, Unpublished Decision (8-20-2004)

2004 Ohio 4386
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 20, 2004
DocketCase No. 2003-T-0134.
StatusUnpublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 2004 Ohio 4386 (City of Warren v. Clay, Unpublished Decision (8-20-2004)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Warren v. Clay, Unpublished Decision (8-20-2004), 2004 Ohio 4386 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

OPINION
{¶ 1} On September 17, 2003, appellant, Clarence Clay, was found guilty, after a jury trial, of obstructing official business, a misdemeanor of the second degree, and failure to stop at a stop sign, a minor misdemeanor. On September 25, 2003, the Warren Municipal Court sentenced appellant to 90 days in the Trumbull County Jail, with 60 days suspended, for obstructing official business. Appellant was placed on a 5 year reporting probationary period which was premised on several stipulated restrictions. For the failure to stop conviction, appellant was fined $10 and court costs. Appellant filed a timely appeal of his sentence.

{¶ 2} Appellant raises four assignments of error for our review; in sum, appellant challenges the lower court's application of the statutory sentencing guidelines to his particular case. We will address all four of appellant's assignments of error simultaneously.

{¶ 3} Although his notice of appeal indicates appellant ordered a partial transcript from the court reporter, the record reflects, on appeal, that no transcript has been filed. Because appellant's appeal challenges his sentence, a transcript of the sentencing hearing is necessary. Further, appellant challenges the trial court's general construction of events as they pertain to his sentence and sets forth accusations regarding the trial court's impartiality. Thus, the trial transcript is also necessary for a thorough review of the appellant's contentions.

{¶ 4} An appellant is required to provide a transcript for appellate review. Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories (1980),61 Ohio St.2d 197, 199. Such is necessary because an appellant shoulders the burden of demonstrating error by reference to matters within the record. See, State v. Skaggs (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 162,163.

{¶ 5} This principle is embodied in App.R. 9(B), which states in relevant part:

{¶ 6} "At the time of filing the notice of appeal the appellant, in writing, shall order from the reporter a complete transcript or a transcript of the parts of the proceedings not already on file as the appellant considers necessary for inclusion in the record and file a copy of the order with the clerk. * * * If the appellant intends to urge on appeal that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the weight of the evidence, the appellant shall include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to the findings or conclusion." App.R. 9(B); see, also, Streetsborov. Hughes (July 31, 1987), 11th Dist. No. 1741, 1987 Ohio App. LEXIS 8109, at 2.

{¶ 7} Where portions of the transcript necessary for the resolution of assigned errors are omitted from the record, an appellate court has nothing to pass upon. As appellant cannot demonstrate those errors, the court has no choice but to presume the validity of the lower court's proceedings. State v. Ridgway (Feb. 1, 1999), 5th Dist. No. 1998CA00147, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 766, at 3, citing Knapp, supra. Under the circumstances, a transcript of the proceedings is necessary for a complete review of the errors assigned in appellant's brief. As appellant has failed to provide this court with a transcript, we must presume regularity of the proceedings below and affirm.

{¶ 8} Appellant's four assignments of error are therefore overruled.

{¶ 9} For the above stated reasons, the judgment of the Warren Municipal Court is hereby affirmed.

Ford, P.J., Christley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ober
2024 Ohio 3063 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
Slodov v. Eagle Ridge Subdivision Property Owner's Assn., Inc.
2023 Ohio 3688 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
Frangioudakis v. Floran
2023 Ohio 507 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
State v. Hogya
2023 Ohio 342 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
State v. DeLuca
2021 Ohio 1007 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2021)
State ex rel. Ames v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
2020 Ohio 3932 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Lao
2018 Ohio 3745 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Holnapy
956 N.E.2d 897 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. Hundzsa, 2008-P-0012 (9-26-2008)
2008 Ohio 4985 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 Ohio 4386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-warren-v-clay-unpublished-decision-8-20-2004-ohioctapp-2004.