City of Teague v. City of Fairfield and Its Mayor Kenneth Hughes, in His Official Capacity

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 29, 2021·No. 10-19-00171-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00171-CV

CITY OF TEAGUE, Appellant v.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, Appellee

From the 87th District Court Freestone County, Texas Trial Court No. CV 18-334-1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

An “Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal” was filed in this appeal on September 22,

2021. In the motion, the parties, the City of Teague and the City of Fairfield, assert that

as a result of mediation, they have reached a settlement of the claims that are the subject

of this appeal and that a final settlement agreement has been fully approved and formally

executed by the appropriate governing bodies of both parties. Accordingly, the parties

jointly move the Court to dismiss the appeal as moot.

After consideration of the parties’ motion, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). There being no agreement as

to costs, costs are taxed against appellant, the City of Teague. Id. (d).

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Motion granted Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed September 29, 2021 [CV06]

City of Teague v. City of Fairfield Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00171-CV

CITY OF TEAGUE, Appellant v.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, Appellee

From the 87th District Court Freestone County, Texas Trial Court No. CV 18-334-1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

An “Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal” was filed in this appeal on September 22,

2021. In the motion, the parties, the City of Teague and the City of Fairfield, assert that

as a result of mediation, they have reached a settlement of the claims that are the subject

of this appeal and that a final settlement agreement has been fully approved and formally

executed by the appropriate governing bodies of both parties. Accordingly, the parties

jointly move the Court to dismiss the appeal as moot.

After consideration of the parties’ motion, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). There being no agreement as

to costs, costs are taxed against appellant, the City of Teague. Id. (d).

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Motion granted Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed September 29, 2021 [CV06]

City of Teague v. City of Fairfield Page 2

City of Teague v. City of Fairfield and Its Mayor Kenneth Hughes, in His Official Capacity, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

City of Teague v. City of Fairfield and Its Mayor Kenneth Hughes, in His Official Capacity (City of Teague v. City of Fairfield and Its Mayor Kenneth Hughes, in His Official Capacity) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.