City of Teague v. City of Fairfield and Its Mayor Kenneth Hughes, in His Official Capacity

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 7, 2021
Docket10-19-00171-CV
StatusPublished

This text of City of Teague v. City of Fairfield and Its Mayor Kenneth Hughes, in His Official Capacity (City of Teague v. City of Fairfield and Its Mayor Kenneth Hughes, in His Official Capacity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Teague v. City of Fairfield and Its Mayor Kenneth Hughes, in His Official Capacity, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00148-CV

CITY OF FAIRFIELD, Appellant v.

CITY OF TEAGUE, Appellee

From the 87th District Court Freestone County, Texas Trial Court No. CV 18-334-B

***

No. 10-19-00171-CV

CITY OF TEAGUE, Appellant v.

CITY OF FAIRFIELD AND ITS MAYOR KENNETH HUGHES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Appellees From the 87th District Court Freestone County, Texas Trial Court No. CV 18-334-1

REFERRAL TO MEDIATION ORDER

The Legislature has provided for the resolution of disputes through alternative

dispute resolution (ADR) procedures. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 154.001-

154.073. The policy behind ADR is stated in the statute: “It is the policy of this state to

encourage the peaceable resolution of disputes . . . and the early settlement of pending

litigation through voluntary settlement procedures.” Id. § 154.002. Mediation is a form of

ADR. Mediation is a mandatory but non-binding settlement conference, conducted with the

assistance of a mediator. Mediation is private, confidential, and privileged.

We find that these appeals are appropriate for mediation. See id. § 154.021(a).

The Court assigns the Honorable Deborah Hankinson as the mediator for these

proceedings. Her address and contact number are as follows:

Deborah Hankinson 3838 Oak Lawn Avenue Suite 1000 Dallas, TX 752191 (214) 754-9185

Mediation must occur within 60 days from the date of this Order.

No less than seven calendar days before the first scheduled mediation session, each

City of Fairfield v. City of Teague Page 2 City of Teague v. City of Fairfield, et al. party must provide the mediator and all other parties with an information sheet setting forth

the party’s positions about the issues that need to be resolved. At or before the first session,

all parties must produce all information necessary for the mediator to understand the issues

presented. The mediator may require any party to supplement the information required by

this Order.

The mediator may make any orders determined to be necessary or appropriate to

conduct the ordered mediation in such a way that the mediation has the best opportunity to

reach a successful result. The mediator’s orders may include, but are not limited to, ordering

the mediation to occur entirely via Zoom or some other media option, ordering the

mediation to occur entirely in person at a place and time that the mediator determines is

reasonable in light of the timing of the issues that need to be resolved, and/or assessing the

cost of mediation other than equally if one of the parties seeks accommodations that the

mediator determines are not of equal benefit to all the parties.

Named parties must be present during the entire mediation process, and each party

that is not a natural person must be represented by an employee, officer, agent, or

representative with authority to bind the party to settlement.

Immediately after mediation, the mediator must advise this Court, in writing, only

that the cases did or did not settle and the amount of the mediator’s fee paid by each party.

The mediator’s fees will be taxed as costs. Unless the mediator agrees to mediate without

fee or other arrangements are negotiated or ordered by the mediator as authorized above,

City of Fairfield v. City of Teague Page 3 City of Teague v. City of Fairfield, et al. the mediator must negotiate a reasonable fee with the parties, and the parties must each pay

one-half of the agreed-upon fee directly to the mediator.

Failure or refusal to attend the entire mediation as scheduled may result in the

imposition of sanctions, as permitted by law.

Any objection to this Order must be filed with this Court and served upon all parties

within ten days after the date of this Order, or it is waived.

We refer these appeals to mediation.

The appeals and all appellate deadlines are suspended as of the date of this Order.

The suspension of these appeals is automatically lifted when the mediator’s report to the

Court is received. If the matters are not resolved at mediation, any deadline that began to

run and had not expired by the date of this Order will begin anew as of the date the Court

receives the mediator’s report. Any document filed by a party after the date of this Order

and prior to the filing of the mediator’s report will be deemed filed on the same day, but

after, the mediator’s report is received.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, and Justice Johnson Referred to mediation Order issued and filed June 7, 2021 [RWR]

City of Fairfield v. City of Teague Page 4 City of Teague v. City of Fairfield, et al.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 154.001
Texas CP § 154.001

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
City of Teague v. City of Fairfield and Its Mayor Kenneth Hughes, in His Official Capacity, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-teague-v-city-of-fairfield-and-its-mayor-kenneth-hughes-in-his-texapp-2021.