City of Statesville v. Cloaninger
This text of 418 S.E.2d 664 (City of Statesville v. Cloaninger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITY OF STATESVILLE
v.
Joe A CLOANINGER and Julia W. Cloaninger.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Edmund L. Gaines, Statesville, for plaintiff.
Ronald K. Payne and Robert B. Long, Asheville, for defendants.
Prior report: 106 N.C.App. 10, 415 S.E.2d 111.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendants; and upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 1992."
The Petition for Discretionary Review is:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 1992."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 S.E.2d 664, 331 N.C. 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-statesville-v-cloaninger-nc-1992.