City of Shreveport v. Simon
This text of 60 So. 795 (City of Shreveport v. Simon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The city of Shreveport, alleging possession of Southern avenue as a public highway for many years, instituted this jactitation, or slander of title, suit against 'the defendants.
Defendants excepted that the plaintiff had no possession of the strip of ground in controversy sufficient to support the action. This exception was overruled.
Defendants then answered, assuming the position of plaintiffs in a petitory action, and set forth their title. Plaintiff answered, and set up title by dedication and by prescription. There was judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed.
In 1896 Howard T. Cole made a subdivision, called Tuxedo Park, of lots 2, 3, and 4 of Alley’s subdivision of part of W. % of S. E. *4 of section 1, township 17, range 14, then beyond the limits of the city of Shreveport. A plat of the Tuxedo Park subdivision was recorded April 4, 1896. On the face of the plat the subdivision was bounded on the east by Fairfield avenue and on the west by Southern avenue, both of the apparent width of 60 feet. While nothing on the face of the plat was given for Southern avenue, it was made one of the boundaries, and it is proved beyond dispute that, according to the actual survey as made on 'the ground, a strip 20 feet in width in Southern avenue was not included in the- Tuxedo Park subdivision. It seems that this strip had for many years prior to 1896 been used [72]*72as a portion of a public road with tbe consent of the owners of tbe Alley tract, and had been left outside of tbe fences inclosing said property. Tbe owners of tbe lands on the other side of tbe half-mile section line bad also left out a similar strip of land for tbe same purpose. Tbe two strips constituted a highway which was used by tbe public. Since 1898 tbe said road has been used as one of tbe streets of tbe city of Shreveport.
For tbe purpose of recasting tbe decree, tbe judgment is reversed, and it is now ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the line between Southern avenue and tbe lots claimed by defendants be fixed and established at a point 20 feet east of tbe half section line bounding the Alley tract on tbe west, and that tbe costs below be equally divided between tbe parties, and tbe costs of appeal be paid by tbe defendants and appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 So. 795, 132 La. 69, 1912 La. LEXIS 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-shreveport-v-simon-la-1912.