City of Rochester v. Chiarella
This text of 472 N.E.2d 46 (City of Rochester v. Chiarella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John H. Doerr at the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 8) other than as it relates to the Statute of Limitations defense, that defense having been withdrawn. Question certified answered in the affirmative. We add that on this appeal the effect of the claims of nonprotestors on the right of protestors to full refund is not before us.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 N.E.2d 46, 63 N.Y.2d 857, 482 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-rochester-v-chiarella-ny-1984.