City of Rochester v. Chiarella
472 N.E.2d 46, 63 N.Y.2d 857, 482 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4656
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John H. Doerr at the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 8) other than as it relates to the Statute of Limitations defense, that defense having been withdrawn. Question certified answered in the affirmative. We add that on this appeal the effect of the claims of nonprotestors on the right of protestors to full refund is not before us.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Rochester v. Chiarella, 472 N.E.2d 46, 63 N.Y.2d 857, 482 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4656 (N.Y. 1984).
472 N.E.2d 46 (City of Rochester v. Chiarella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY
148 A.D.3d 1702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Essex County
129 A.D.3d 1255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
WHITMER, JUDITH R. v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF, TAXATION AND FINANCE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Whitmer v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance
120 A.D.3d 1590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
1963 Elmwood Avenue, Inc. v. Tanzella
193 A.D.2d 1110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Michael v. Communications Workers of America AFL-CIO
130 Misc. 2d 424 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)
City of Rochester v. Chiarella
65 N.Y. 92 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)