City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1

886 A.2d 682, 584 Pa. 575, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2674
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 30, 2005·No. Petition Nos. 347-348 WAL 2004·Published

Opinion

[576]*576 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issue:

Whether the Commonwealth Court’s decision permitting the reduction of post-retirement healthcare benefits for active officers conflicts with the Supreme Court decision in Appeal of Upper Providence Twp ?

The order of the Commonwealth Court is vacated insofar as it resolved the post retirement health care benefits issue, and the case is remanded to the Commonwealth Court for consideration and analysis of this Court’s decision in Appeal of Upper Providence Township, 514 Pa. 501, 526 A.2d 315 (1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, 886 A.2d 682, 584 Pa. 575, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2674 (Pa. 2005).

886 A.2d 682 (City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Appeal of Upper Providence Police Delaware County Lodge 27
526 A.2d 315 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)