City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1

886 A.2d 682

DecidedNovember 30, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 886 A.2d 682 (City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, 886 A.2d 682 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2005, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issue:

Whether the Commonwealth Court’s decision permitting the reduction of post-retirement healthcare benefits for active officers conflicts with the Supreme Court decision in Appeal of Upper Providence Twp?

The order of the Commonwealth Court is vacated insofar as it resolved the post retirement health care benefits issue, and the case is remanded to the Commonwealth Court for consideration and analysis of this Court’s decision in Appeal of Upper Providence Township, 514 Pa. 501, 526 A.2d 315 (1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI