City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

780 A.2d 601

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 568 Pa. 430 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 1, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2001, the Emergency Application for Stay seeking relief as of July 23, 2001, is hereby DENIED as moot. The Petition for King’s Bench is hereby DENIED.

The appeal shall be entertained on an expedited basis and the prothonotary is directed to issue a briefing schedule in accordance therewith. The parties should concentrate their argument on the question of whether the Commonwealth Court had original jurisdiction to entertain this action. Further implementation of Act 22 of 2001 is stayed pending resolution of this appeal.

Justices NEWMAN and SAYLOR dissent from that portion of the order staying further implementation of Act 22 of 2001 pending the resolution of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2001, the Emergency Application for Stay seeking relief as of July 23, 2001, is hereby DENIED as moot. The Petition for King’s Bench is hereby DENIED.

Justices NEWMAN and SAYLOR dissent from that portion of the order staying further implementation of Act 22 of 2001 pending the resolution of the appeal.

City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, 780 A.2d 601 (Pa. 2001).

Pincite

780 A.2d 601 (City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.