City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

780 A.2d 601, 566 Pa. 230, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1661
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 1, 2001·No. Appeal No. 28 EAP 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2001, the Emergency Application for Stay seeking relief as of July 23, 2001, is hereby DENIED as moot. The Petition for King’s Bench is hereby DENIED.

[231]*231The appeal shall be entertained on an expedited basis and the prothonotary is directed to issue a briefing schedule in accordance therewith. The parties should concentrate their argument on the question of whether the Commonwealth Court had original jurisdiction to entertain this action. Further implementation of Act 22 of 2001 is stayed pending resolution of this appeal.

Justices NEWMAN and SAYLOR dissent from that portion of the order staying further implementation of Act 22 of 2001 pending the resolution of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, 780 A.2d 601, 566 Pa. 230, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1661 (Pa. 2001).

780 A.2d 601 (City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Parking Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Philadelphia v. Schweiker
858 A.2d 75 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)