City of Owensboro v. McFall

156 S.W. 388, 153 Ky. 754, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 913
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided May 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by Chief

Justice Hobson-

Sustaining motion, to set aside judgment for costs.

Section 3366, Ky. Stats., provides:

“In prosecutions and proceedings in the police court and in.appeals therefrom the city shall not he liable for costs unless the same be collected in money and paid into the city treasury.”

This was a. prosecution begun in the police court for a violation of a city ordinance and the defendant was ácquitted. The city is not liable for cost either in the police court or on appeal. In 11 Cyc, 278, the rule is thus stated:

/ “A city, town or village is never liable for costs of proceedings under its ordinances, whether the defendant be acquitted or convicted; unless a statute so provides, and this is true whether the proceeding is considered civil or criminal. This rule is not affected by the fact that the ordinance under which the prosecution is had is invalid or by the fact that the defendant worked out his costs in the city prison or on the city streets, the labor being performed for the benefit of the city.”

The motion to set aside the judgment for costs and quash the execution is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Owensboro v. McFall, 156 S.W. 388, 153 Ky. 754, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 913 (Ky. Ct. App. 1913).

156 S.W. 388 (City of Owensboro v. McFall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gross Distributing Co. v. City of Shelbyville
447 S.W.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1969)
State Ex Rel. Dunbar v. State Board of Equalization
249 P. 996 (Washington Supreme Court, 1926)
Perkins v. Lucas
246 S.W. 150 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1922)