City of Owensboro v. McFall

153 S.W. 969, 152 Ky. 628, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 709
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided March 5, 1913·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Turner

Affirming.

This was a prosecution instituted in the police court of the city of Owensboro against appellee, wherein he was Charged with the violation of an ordinance of that city. He was fined twenty-five dollars in the police court', but upon appeal to the circuit court of Daviess County, that court found him not guilty as we assume from the motion and grounds for a new trial, upon the ground that the ordinance of the city in question was invalid and unenforceable.

Rut the ordinance in question was not offered in evidence in the circuit court so' far as is: disclosed by the [629]*629bill of exceptions, and is not copied into the transcript as it appears in this court; and as this court is not authorized under the provisions of the charter for cities of the third class-, to which the city of Owensboro belongs, to take judicial notice of their ordinances or contents, wo have nothing before us to determine.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Owensboro v. McFall, 153 S.W. 969, 152 Ky. 628, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 709 (Ky. Ct. App. 1913).

153 S.W. 969 (City of Owensboro v. McFall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marks v. Board of Commissioners
504 S.W.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1974)
Davis v. Pelfrey
147 S.W.2d 723 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1941)
Hamlin v. Durham
32 S.W.2d 413 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1930)