City of New York v. Stringfellow's of New York, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of New York v. Stringfellow's of New York, Ltd.

268 A.D.2d 216, 700 N.Y.S.2d 683, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 23

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 4, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 216 (City of New York v. Stringfellow's of New York, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New York v. Stringfellow's of New York, Ltd., 268 A.D.2d 216, 700 N.Y.S.2d 683, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 23 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered March 8, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, incorporated this Court’s decision and order, entered February 4, 1999 (253 AD2d 110), which, inter alla, granted plaintiff City partial summary judgment on the issue of whether defendant’s cabaret falls within the definition of adult eating or drinking establishment under section 12-10 (adult establishment) (b) of the New York City Zoning Resolution, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s present appellate contentions to the effect that its purported policy respecting the admission of minors to its cabaret takes it outside the definition of an “adult eating or drinking establishment”, “have been resolved by [this] appellate court on a prior appeal [and] will not be reviewed [by this Court] upon a further appeal” (Matter of Local 345 of Retail Store Empls. Union [Heinrich Motors], 96 AD2d 182, 186, revd on other grounds 63 NY2d 985). Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered March 8, 1999, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, incorporated this Court’s decision and order, entered February 4, 1999 (253 AD2d 110), which, inter alla, granted plaintiff City partial summary judgment on the issue of whether defendant’s cabaret falls within the definition of adult eating or drinking establishment under section 12-10 (adult establishment) (b) of the New York City Zoning Resolution, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s present appellate contentions to the effect that its purported policy respecting the admission of minors to its cabaret takes it outside the definition of an “adult eating or drinking establishment”, “have been resolved by [this] appellate court on a prior appeal [and] will not be reviewed [by this Court] upon a further appeal” (Matter of Local 345 of Retail Store Empls. Union [Heinrich Motors], 96 AD2d 182, 186, revd on other grounds 63 NY2d 985). Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 216, 700 N.Y.S.2d 683, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-york-v-stringfellows-of-new-york-ltd-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack