City of New York v. State

New York Court of Appeals

City of New York v. State

291 N.E.2d 583, 31 N.Y.2d 804

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 3, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 291 N.E.2d 583 (City of New York v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New York v. State, 291 N.E.2d 583, 31 N.Y.2d 804 (N.Y. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

31 N.Y.2d 804 (1972)

City of New York, Appellant,
v.
State of New York et al., Respondents, and 205 East 69th Street Corporation and All Other Similarly Situated Property Owners, et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 1, 1972. Decided November 3, 1972.

Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel (Edmund B. Hennefeld and James Nespole of counsel), for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Daniel M. Cohen and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), for respondents.

Robert S. Fougner for 205 East 69th Street Corporation, intervenor-respondent.

Harold Zucker and Joseph Slipyan for New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, intervenor-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

31 N.Y.2d 804 (1972)

City of New York, Appellant,
v.
State of New York et al., Respondents, and 205 East 69th Street Corporation and All Other Similarly Situated Property Owners, et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 1, 1972. Decided November 3, 1972.

Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel (Edmund B. Hennefeld and James Nespole of counsel), for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Daniel M. Cohen and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), for respondents.

Robert S. Fougner for 205 East 69th Street Corporation, intervenor-respondent.

Harold Zucker and Joseph Slipyan for New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, intervenor-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 N.E.2d 583, 31 N.Y.2d 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-york-v-state-ny-1972.

Opinion

City of New York, Appellant, v. State of New York et al., Respondents, and 205 East 69th Street Corporation and All Other Similarly Situated Property Owners, et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

City of New York, Appellant,
v.
State of New York et al., Respondents, and 205 East 69th Street Corporation and All Other Similarly Situated Property Owners, et al., Intervenors-Respondents.