City of New York v. James A. Baker Iii, Secretary of State, Bruce Cronin v. James A. Baker Iii, Secretary of State
888 F.2d 134, 281 U.S. App. D.C. 121, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15780
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 6, 1989·No. 88-5236, 88-5237·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
ON APPELLANTS’ PETITION FOR REHEARING
[135]*135A Statement of Circuit Judge STEPHEN H. WILLIAMS concurring in the denial of the petition for rehearing follows herein.
ORDER
Upon consideration of appellants’ petition for rehearing, it is
ORDERED, by the Court, that the petition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of New York v. James A. Baker Iii, Secretary of State, Bruce Cronin v. James A. Baker Iii, Secretary of State, 888 F.2d 134, 281 U.S. App. D.C. 121, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15780 (D.C. Cir. 1989).
888 F.2d 134 (City of New York v. James A. Baker Iii, Secretary of State, Bruce Cronin v. James A. Baker Iii, Secretary of State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Historical Ass'n v. Peterson
876 F. Supp. 1300 (District of Columbia, 1995)
City of New York v. James A. Baker Iii, Secretary of State, Bruce Cronin v. James A. Baker Iii, Secretary of State
888 F.2d 134 (D.C. Circuit, 1989)