City of Miami Springs v. Steffen

423 So. 2d 930
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 1982
Docket82-1148
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 423 So. 2d 930 (City of Miami Springs v. Steffen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Miami Springs v. Steffen, 423 So. 2d 930 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

423 So.2d 930 (1982)

CITY OF MIAMI SPRINGS, Joined by E. Michael Myers, Appellants,
v.
Earl C. STEFFEN and Mardell Steffen, His Wife, Appellees.

No. 82-1148.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 16, 1982.
Rehearing Denied January 10, 1983.

*931 Albert L. Weintraub, Joseph H. Weil, Miami, for appellants.

J. Arthur Hawkesworth, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

FERGUSON, Judge.

We reverse the temporary mandatory injunction which directs defendants to pay plaintiffs $53,491.21 in back wages. The purpose of a temporary injunction is to preserve the status quo until full relief may be granted. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 212 So.2d 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). There is no irreparable harm for the purpose of a temporary injunction where the harm can be adequately compensated for by a monetary award. Goldberger v. Regency Highland Condominium Association, Inc., 383 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). A temporary injunction does not decide the merits of a case unless (1) the hearing is specially set for that purpose, and (2) the parties have had a full opportunity to present their cases. University of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 101 S.Ct. 1830, 68 L.Ed.2d 175 (1981); Ladner v. Plaza Del Prado Condominium Association, Inc., 423 So.2d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maria Teresa Costantini Gomes v. Victor Maniglia
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
XIP TECHNOLOGIES, L L C v. ASCEND GLOBAL SERVICES, L L C
253 So. 3d 1183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
BAUTISTA REO U.S., LLC v. ARR INVESTMENTS, INC.
229 So. 3d 362 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Landmark At Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Financial, Inc., a California Corporation
219 So. 3d 218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Riverland and Indian Sun v. Lj Melody
879 So. 2d 1271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Charlotte County v. Vetter
863 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
GSSP Enterprise, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County
821 So. 2d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Yachting Promotions, Inc. v. Broward
792 So. 2d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Hialeah, Inc. v. Calder Race Course, Inc.
620 So. 2d 261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Camji v. Helmsley
602 So. 2d 617 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
BGH Ins. Syndicate, Inc. v. PRESIDENTIAL FIRE & CAS.
549 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
South Fla. Limo., Inc. v. Broward Cty. Av., Dept.
512 So. 2d 1059 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Homeopathic Physicians v. DEPT. OF PROF. REG.
487 So. 2d 374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Jacksonville Elec. v. Beemik Builders
487 So. 2d 372 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Bailey v. Christo
453 So. 2d 1134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Hotelerama Associates, Ltd. v. Bystrom
449 So. 2d 836 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 So. 2d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-miami-springs-v-steffen-fladistctapp-1982.