City of Manchester v. Dunn

142 S.E. 747, 38 Ga. App. 83, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 44
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 1928
Docket18686
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 142 S.E. 747 (City of Manchester v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Manchester v. Dunn, 142 S.E. 747, 38 Ga. App. 83, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 44 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Broydes, C. J.

Dunn was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Manchester of the violation of a certain ordinance of that city, and by certiorari took the case to the superior court of Meriwether county. Upon the hearing the judge of the superior court held that the ordinance was invalid and sustained the certiorari. The City of Manchester excepted to that judgment and sued out a writ of error.

In no criminal or quasi-criminal case has the State or any municipality the authority to except to any sentence, judgment, or decision of the court. Such exception can be made only by the accused.

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Gainesville v. Butts
193 S.E.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
City of Winder v. Abner
192 S.E.2d 584 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
City of Dacula v. Allen
120 S.E.2d 311 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
City of Atlanta v. Stallings
32 S.E.2d 256 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
City of Atlanta v. Stallings
31 S.E.2d 75 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.E. 747, 38 Ga. App. 83, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-manchester-v-dunn-gactapp-1928.