City of Gainesville v. Butts

193 S.E.2d 59, 127 Ga. App. 140, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 816
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 25, 1972
Docket47519
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 S.E.2d 59 (City of Gainesville v. Butts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Gainesville v. Butts, 193 S.E.2d 59, 127 Ga. App. 140, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 816 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.

John Butts, Jr. was convicted in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Gainesville on a [141]*141charge of disorderly conduct. He applied to and obtained from the Superior Court of Hall County a writ of certiorari. The city’s motion to dismiss based upon a failure of the applicant to file a properly approved bond under Code § 19-214 was denied and upon a hearing the conviction was set aside, the ordinance being declared to be void for vagueness and uncertainty. The city now appeals from the rulings and judgment of the superior court. Held:.

Argued September 15, 1972 Decided September 25, 1972.

'"The decision of the superior court on certiorari reversing the judgment of a municipal court convicting one of a violation of a municipal ordinance is not subject to review by this court.’ Mayor &c. of Hawkinsville v. Ethridge, 96 Ga. 326 (22 SE 985); Mayor &c. of Macon v. Wood, 109 Ga. 149 (34 SE 322).” City of Valdosta v. Goodwin, 21 Ga. App. 664 (94 SE 812); City of Albany v. Hardy, 26 Ga. App. 433 (106 SE 311); Cranston v. City of Augusta, 61 Ga. 572. The rule applies when the superior court has declared the ordinance to be invalid (City of Manchester v. Dunn, 38 Ga. App. 83 (142 SE 747)), or where it is held that the conviction was not. authorized by the evidence (City of Moultrie v. Csiki, 71 Ga. App. 13 (29 SE2d 785)), and even though the defendant failed to file a valid bond required under Code § 19-214. City of Dacula v. Allen, 103 Ga. App. 600 (120 SE2d 311). An appeal by the city will not lie on the ground that the judgment of the superior court is void (City of Manchester v. Rowe, 60 Ga. App. 567 (4 SE2d 477)), nor will it lie to the denial of the city’s motion to dismiss the writ. Mayor &c. of Hawkinsville v. Ethridge, 96 Ga. 326, supra. Only the accused may appeal an adverse judgment in a criminal proceeding. Code Ann. § 6-901. The city may, of course, appeal adverse rulings in matters other than criminal proceedings. City of Atlanta v. Stallings, 198 Ga. 510 (32 SE2d 256).

Appeal dismissed.

Deen and Clark, JJ., concur. Palmour & Palmour, J. Ernest Palmour, Jr., for appellant. Robinson, Buice, Harben & Strickland, Sam S. Harben, Jr., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeKalb County v. Gerard
427 S.E.2d 36 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 S.E.2d 59, 127 Ga. App. 140, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-gainesville-v-butts-gactapp-1972.