City of Long Beach v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

City of Long Beach v. Anderson

33 P.2d 876, 139 Cal. App. 789

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 6, 1934

DocketCiv. No. 5101

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 P.2d 876 (City of Long Beach v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Long Beach v. Anderson, 33 P.2d 876, 139 Cal. App. 789 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

This is -an appeal from an order refusing to retax costs. The facts are exactly the same as those which were involved in the case of City of Long Beach, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. May E. Anderson et al., Defendants; Edison Securities Company, a Corporation, Respondent (Civil No. 5092), ante, p. 130 [33 Pac. (2d) 875], in which an opinion of this court was this day filed, except that the expert witness fees which were allowed in this case amounted to the sum of $95.80.

[790]*790Upon the .authority of that ease, the order in this case is reversed, with direction to the court to retax costs in accordance therewith.

Pullen, P. J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

A petition by respondent to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 2, 1934.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON, J.

This is -an appeal from an order refusing to retax costs. The facts are exactly the same as those which were involved in the case of City of Long Beach, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. May E. Anderson et al., Defendants; Edison Securities Company, a Corporation, Respondent (Civil No. 5092), ante, p. 130 [33 Pac. (2d) 875], in which an opinion of this court was this day filed, except that the expert witness fees which were allowed in this case amounted to the sum of $95.80.

[790]*790Upon the .authority of that ease, the order in this case is reversed, with direction to the court to retax costs in accordance therewith.

Pullen, P. J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

A petition by respondent to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 2, 1934.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 P.2d 876, 139 Cal. App. 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-long-beach-v-anderson-calctapp-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack