City of Lakeport v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedJuly 8, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-04007
StatusUnknown

This text of City of Lakeport v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation (City of Lakeport v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Lakeport v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, (N.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION MDL No. 2804

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —163)

On December 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 62 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 290 F.Supp.3d 1375 (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 2,029 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Pollster. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge Polster. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 5, 2017, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: Seem time, the Lf A ee, John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel

| hereby certify that this instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. Attest: Sandy Opacich, Clerk U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio By: /s/Robert Pitts Eee, Deputy Clerk Se

SCHEDULE CTO-163 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

_ City of Lakeport et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug CAN | 20-04007 Corporation et al LOUISIANA EASTERN Opposed 7/ EAE 2 20-0442. Assumption Parish Pelee tiny Atersan PEC LAE 2 2O=O4 FP. FaleonsAderean PEG etal — opposed 7/2/2020 LOUISIANA MIDDLE

3 West jon Parish Hospital Service □□□□□□□□□□ EAM 20-00385 ArmeriseureeBercen Drie -Corperation-etal — opposed □□□□□□□□ OKLAHOMA EASTERN OKE 6 20-00178 Chickasaw Nation v. McKesson Corporation et al OKE 6 20-00179 Choctaw Nation v. McKesson Corporation et al SOUTH CAROLINA

_ Medical University Hospital Authority et al v. Endo SC 2 20-0259 Health Solutions Inc et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Nat'l Prescription Opiate Litig.
290 F. Supp. 3d 1375 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
City of Lakeport v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-lakeport-v-amerisourcebergen-drug-corporation-cand-2020.