City of Honolulu v. Bonded Investment Co.

54 Haw. 414
CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 29, 1973
DocketNo. 5243
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 54 Haw. 414 (City of Honolulu v. Bonded Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Honolulu v. Bonded Investment Co., 54 Haw. 414 (haw 1973).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for leave to file petition for rehearing as amicus curiae is denied without argument.

Circuit Judge Lanham, who dissented, does not concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Kenai v. Burnett
860 P.2d 1233 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Haw. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-honolulu-v-bonded-investment-co-haw-1973.