City of Galveston v. United States
This text of 386 U.S. 269 (City of Galveston v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
87 S.Ct. 1018
18 L.Ed.2d 38
CITY OF GALVESTON et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 827.
The ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RY. CO. et al.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 828.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 13, 1967
Harold E. Spencer and Nuel D. Belnap, for appellants City of Galveston and others.
Don McDevitt, Sterling W. Steves, Harvey Huston and Milton E. Nelson, Jr., for appellants Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. and others.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman, for the United States and others.
Frank A. Leffingwell, for appellees Nueces County Nav. Dist. No. 1 and others.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
386 U.S. 269, 87 S. Ct. 1018, 18 L. Ed. 2d 38, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-galveston-v-united-states-scotus-1967.