City of Fall River v. County Commissioners of Bristol

125 Mass. 567, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 135
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 11, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 125 Mass. 567 (City of Fall River v. County Commissioners of Bristol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Fall River v. County Commissioners of Bristol, 125 Mass. 567, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 135 (Mass. 1878).

Opinion

Morton, J.

It appears from the return of the county commissioners that the tax in question was assessed upon a reservoir company, under the St. of 1872, c. 306, in the terms following: “ Reservoir of water used to maintain a uniform supply of water for mill purposes, with the dam connected therewith, and the land under the same,” and that this was the only tax assessed by the city of Fall River upon said reservoir company during the year 1876. In Cheshire v. County Commissioners, 118 Mass. 386, it was held that this statute was unconstitutional and void. It necessarily follows that the tax in question was illegal.

The claim of the petitioner, that this tax may be upheld because the reservoir company was taxable for a part of its property, cannot be sustained. One sufficient answer is, that it had no property which was liable to taxation. It did not own the dam, nor any of the land covered by the pond. The dam was [568]*568built at the outlet of the Watuppa ponds, which were great ponds, on the land of the Troy Cotton and Woollen Manufactory; and the only interest in any land which the reservoir company had was the right to flow the lands surrounding the ponds to a point two feet above the old dam. This is merely an easement in the land, which cannot be taxed independently. It forms part of the water-power which is taxed in connection with the mills, as enhancing their value.

The reservoir company, being a corporation having a capital stock divided into shares, was not liable to be taxed for the cash in its treasury, that being personal property which enters into the value of the shares. Boston & Sandwich Glass Co. v. Boston, 4 Met. 181.

For these reasons, without discussing others, we are of opinion that the decision of the commissioners abating the tax was cor rect. Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amory v. Commonwealth
72 N.E.2d 549 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1947)
Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co. v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
39 N.E.2d 647 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)
Stansell v. American Radiator Co.
128 N.W. 789 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)
Hancock County v. Imperial Naval Stores Co.
47 So. 177 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1908)
Dunsmuir v. Port Angeles Gas, Water, Electric Light & Power Co.
63 P. 1095 (Washington Supreme Court, 1901)
Union Water Power Co. v. City of Auburn
37 L.R.A. 651 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1897)
Inhabitants of Paris v. Norway Water Co.
21 L.R.A. 525 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1893)
Flax Pond Water Co. v. City of Lynn
16 N.E. 742 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
State v. U. S. & Canada Express Co.
60 N.H. 219 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 Mass. 567, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-fall-river-v-county-commissioners-of-bristol-mass-1878.